ST Alpha - "Arstechnica on the Starship launch echoing what I was saying on the backboards -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

Arstechnica on the Starship launch echoing what I was saying on the backboards -- (link)

Posted by TWuG Apr 20 '23, 15:41

(No message)

https://arstechnica.com/science/2023/04/so-what-was-that-was-starships-launch-a-failure-or-a-success/ (arstechnica.com)

Responses:

minimum viable product is a shitty design ethos. -- nm - mafic Apr 20, 16:42 3
- How is the process that built Falcon 9, the most reliable rocket flying and the only reusable one "minimum viable"? -- nm - TWuG Apr 20, 16:56 2
  - what he's describing in the article is "make it good enough, launch it, and see what happens." that's almost the definition of minimum viable. - mafic Apr 20, 17:26 1
    - As an iterative process, not as a final product. The goal with this launch was "clear the launch pad" - TWuG Apr 20, 17:53
I think we need to stop seeing everything as a success or a failure - Guigue Apr 20, 15:47 3
- I agree with Grogu. - Reluctant Cynic Apr 20, 16:03 2
  - You misspelled "Din Guigue". -- nm - Ender Apr 20, 16:22 1
    - heh -- nm - Beaker Apr 20, 17:11

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.