Backboards: 
Posts: 151
In response to "How is the process that built Falcon 9, the most reliable rocket flying and the only reusable one "minimum viable"? -- nm" by TWuG

what he's describing in the article is "make it good enough, launch it, and see what happens." that's almost the definition of minimum viable.

also Atlas V has never failed. Falcon 9 has, and even then Soyuz has been going a lot longer and safer than either of them.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.