ST Alpha - "I mean, they need security. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "This article from yesterday certainly suggests a motivation to frame the matter in a certain way. -- (link*)" by znufrii 🦄

I mean, they need security. -- nm

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) May 17 '23, 07:55

(No message)

Responses:

I’m inclined to agree that they shouldn’t be able to hire the police. Frankly, if there’s a threat, police protection should be free. - Mop🧹 May 17, 07:57 7
- I have no idea who's allowed to hire the police. -- nm - loosilu May 17, 07:57 6
  - According to the court, *no one* is allowed to hire the police. They’re the police. They’re not for hire. -- nm - Mop🧹 May 17, 07:58 5
    - that is 100% inaccurate. Film sets, street festivals, etc etc all hire off-duty police for events. Not sure if it works for individuals, but police - Andie May 17, 07:59 4
      - *off duty* police offices are *private* security. I get what they want. They want cops. But you can’t just request cops. - Mop🧹 May 17, 08:01 3
        
        They want the flashing lights. -- nm - loosilu May 17, 08:02 2
        
        Yeah. Someone with the authority to do something once lines are crossed. Private security takes out a cameraman that’s just more photos. Cop does it - mafic May 17, 08:05 1
        
        Wouldn't police officially step in at a certain point? The Beatles had police escorts. - loosilu May 17, 08:11
I’m not suggesting they don’t. -- nm - znufrii 🦄 May 17, 07:56

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.