Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 155
In response to
"
I can't believe I like a ruling from this court. I'm happy to see these outcomes. -- nm
"
by
Krusty
have fun suing any tech company when they ruin your life in any actionable way -- nm
Posted by
hollywood big shot (aka pickmix)
May 18 '23, 10:38
(No message)
Responses:
Not something I'm really concerned about and I don't think they're responsible for what everyone posts on their site.
-
Krusty
May 18, 10:48
3
And if my life is ruined by something someone posted it's not the site's fault. It's the person that posted the info.
-
Krusty
May 18, 10:51
2
i know you (and the tech companies) want to frame this as a pure free speech issue but Sec 230 as applied goes far beyond what users post -- (link)
-
hollywood big shot
May 18, 11:07
1
So they can amend the law. They don't need to get rid of it completely.
-
Krusty
May 18, 12:00
But it also means that Bery can't get sued -- nm
-
JD
May 18, 10:47
1
for what? the risk to individuals like Bery has to be weighed against the cost of letting the Airbnbs and Twitters of the world skate 100% on liability -- nm*
-
hollywood big shot
May 18, 10:49
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
