Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 154
In response to
"
But I don't see why that = "no more private insurance" -- nm
"
by
Roger More
did you read the article i linked? according to the bill, you'll be required to go into gov't health care within 5 years.. sooner if you pay for your
Posted by
colinski (aka colinski)
Jul 21 '09, 06:35
own insurance.
and god help you if you file your taxes while uninsured...
Responses:
It says the giovernment will select healthcare plans that meet its standards - they could be public or private -- nm
-
Roger More
Jul 21, 06:39
"qualified health insurance plan" /= "government health care"
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 06:36
24
yeah... it means the private option must match the gov't option..
-
colinski
Jul 21, 06:41
17
That's not saying what you think it says.
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 06:45
15
Regardless, the existence of a floor for quality of coverage doesn't bother me. It's the implication of a ceiling that shocks the hell out of me. -- nm
-
TFox
Jul 21, 06:52
13
(or, to clarify, I suspect the intention of the wording in the bill was to prevent companies from circumventing minimum standards...)
-
TFox
Jul 21, 06:57
What language are you seeing that implies that? Because that wouldn't make any sense to me, either. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 06:53
11
I included it below in this post: -- (link)
-
TFox
Jul 21, 06:58
[Backboard]
5
Thought that was what you were referring to...
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 06:59
4
Like I said, that was why I wanted to see the Senate version of the bill, to confirm.
-
TFox
Jul 21, 07:00
3
I'd like to verify her conclusions, though.
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 07:03
2
I know, I said this from the start. -- nm
-
TFox
Jul 21, 07:09
1
Looks like the title is "The Affordable Health Choices Act"
-
Roger More
Jul 21, 07:10
see below about the Health Exchange..
-
colinski
Jul 21, 06:55
4
Yeah, I haven't read enough of the bill to have any idea how that mechanism is going to work. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 06:58
3
it's like a stock market for health care! if the demand for mammograms is up, you'll be paying more.. -- nm
-
colinski
Jul 21, 07:00
2
Somehow I doubt this is the case. :) -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 07:01
1
yeah, but wouldn't it be more fun? "Colonoscopys are down today! I gotta get to the doctor!" -- nm
-
colinski
Jul 21, 07:02
hmm. i'm gonna keep reading, see if i can get more clarification...
-
colinski
Jul 21, 06:48
To your last line, that is exactly what would concern me too. I hadn't seen that provision before in the summaries I've been sent. -- nm
-
TFox
Jul 21, 06:42
and if I'm reading correctly, Year 1 for that standard is 2013, and it'll be grandfathered for five years after that. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 06:39
5
That said, this one phrase in colin's link is very troublesome, and I want to see the part she is referencing:
-
TFox
Jul 21, 06:42
4
well, reducing consumption is really the only way to cut cost..
-
colinski
Jul 21, 06:46
2
Yep, we're mostly in agreement, and the car insurance comparison is an excellent, perfect example.
-
TFox
Jul 21, 06:50
1
i think it's the difference between making it a requirement and making it a right..
-
colinski
Jul 21, 06:55
I wish the author had cited sections instead of pages, would make it easier to find. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 21, 06:46
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.