|
In response to
"Yep, we're mostly in agreement, and the car insurance comparison is an excellent, perfect example."
by
TFox
|
i think it's the difference between making it a requirement and making it a right..
Posted by
colinski (aka colinski)
Jul 21 '09, 06:55
|
Constitutional rights are not funded by the gov't and shouldn't be paid for by the gov't... they're just our God-given rights that the gov't is to uphold. I don't believe "having health care" is a right, but that bill states that severance from healthcare will be unconstitutional.
making it a requirement is one thing.. like car insurance.. but it's not like we have a "right to car insurance"...
as far as additional coverage, there appears to be a Health Exchange where new coverages can be created, have a cost associated with them, and added to plans... so perhaps there will be, but at what cost?
|