ST Alpha - "I included it below in this post: -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "What language are you seeing that implies that? Because that wouldn't make any sense to me, either. -- nm" by znufrii

I included it below in this post: -- (link)

Posted by TFox Jul 21 '09, 06:58

(No message)

http://hsxtt.com/index.php?post_id=560937&board_id=3563&username=TFox (hsxtt.com)

That said, this one phrase in colin's link is very troublesome, and I want to see the part she is referencing:

TFox Jul 21 '09, 06:42

"It's one thing to require that people getting government assistance tolerate managed care, but the legislation limits you to a managed-care plan even if you and your employer are footing the bill (Senate bill, p. 57-58). The goal is to reduce everyone's consumption of health care and to ensure that people have the same health-care experience, regardless of ability to pay." If so, I find that extremely troubling.

In response to znufrii: "and if I'm reading correctly, Year 1 for that standard is 2013, and it'll be grandfathered for five years after that."

Responses:

Thought that was what you were referring to... - znufrii Jul 21, 06:59 4
- Like I said, that was why I wanted to see the Senate version of the bill, to confirm. - TFox Jul 21, 07:00 3
  - I'd like to verify her conclusions, though. - znufrii Jul 21, 07:03 2
    - I know, I said this from the start. -- nm - TFox Jul 21, 07:09 1
      - Looks like the title is "The Affordable Health Choices Act" - Roger More Jul 21, 07:10

Post a message top

I included it below in this post: -- (link)

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.