ST Alpha - "Seriously, how much more could they possibly need at this point to charge him on the classified documents? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "lordy there's still more tapes -- (link)" by hollywood big shot

Seriously, how much more could they possibly need at this point to charge him on the classified documents? -- nm

Posted by pmb (aka pmb) May 31 '23, 13:29

(No message)

Responses:

The thing is, they can't really charge him about having the documents, because Biden had classified docs too. Now, obstruction on the other hand... -- nm - Ender May 31, 14:38 2
- That's not really the case. The difference of knowledge, intent and the obstruction that essentially proves both is the key. Typical DOJ standards - pmb May 31, 15:32
- intent and/or gross negligence matter (which is why Hillary was never going to be perp walked for her home server) -- nm - hollywood big shot May 31, 14:54
Make the mountain of evidence so large it crushes him. -- nm - TWuG May 31, 13:32 3
- Sure. But charge him. It doesn't mean you stop investigating. It's already a mountain, but there are timing issues that make it imperative to start - pmb May 31, 13:53
- make it undeniable. -- nm - Remlik May 31, 13:37 1
  - Wasted effort. Just make it stick. -- nm - Beryllium May 31, 13:53

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.