Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 155
In response to
"
Seriously, how much more could they possibly need at this point to charge him on the classified documents? -- nm
"
by
pmb
The thing is, they can't really charge him about having the documents, because Biden had classified docs too. Now, obstruction on the other hand... -- nm
Posted by
Ender
May 31 '23, 14:38
(No message)
Responses:
That's not really the case. The difference of knowledge, intent and the obstruction that essentially proves both is the key. Typical DOJ standards
-
pmb
May 31, 15:32
intent and/or gross negligence matter (which is why Hillary was never going to be perp walked for her home server) -- nm
-
hollywood big shot
May 31, 14:54
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.