ST Alpha - "The problem with sequestration technologies" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "My multi-point plan to fix climate change" by Beryllium

The problem with sequestration technologies

Posted by Reagen Jul 19 '23, 14:18

Is that released CO2 represents consumed energy. To "put it back" requires paying back that energy which you're not going to do without using more energy, and if you're using more energy, you're better off using that to replace carbon intensive activities than to make carbonate rock. So passive vegetation is actually the best way to do the that.

Responses:

I knew that using the more specific term and concept would be an issue... ah well. Good thing my plans are useless. -- nm - Beryllium Jul 19, 14:34 1
- We need to start thinking in terms of energy diets - Reagen Jul 19, 15:39

Post a message top

The problem with sequestration technologies

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.