hey dawson, what happens in this scenario re prop 8/gay marriage
|
let's say obama gets 2, maybe even 3 appointments to the S.Ct. and they take a gay marriage case and rule the same way the California court did (a stretch i know, but hypothetically let's say they did)
if they hold that marriage is a fundamental federal constitutional right (which they already have) that cannot be denied based on sexual orientation, doesn't that render things like Prop 8 invalid?
like, you couldn't proposition or constitutionally-amend slavery back in or women's suffrage back out in a state (i don't think).
|
Responses:
|