Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 150
In response to
"
so espn still hasn't said a word about ben r.? and they're saying the reason is it's a civil case? what a load of hooey. -- nm
"
by
b.
I was about to say, not a peep on the two biggest sports-related stories right now.
Posted by
Tim (aka othertim)
Jul 22 '09, 16:20
Although there was an AP article on the EA story in today's local paper.
Responses:
ea as in the suit re: images? i've seen a bunch of stories on that. and here's something on espn's site. nm but: -- (link)
-
b.
Jul 22, 16:24
3
EA = Erin Andrews, not the game company :) -- nm
-
Tim
Jul 22, 16:26
1
oh! hee. -- nm
-
b.
Jul 22, 16:27
actually, here's their news story on it. nm but: -- (link)
-
b.
Jul 22, 16:25
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.