ST Alpha - "We know that conviction in the Senate ain't happening, but there might not even be the votes in the House to impeach." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

We know that conviction in the Senate ain't happening, but there might not even be the votes in the House to impeach.

Posted by Dano (aka dano) Sep 12 '23, 10:18

Strategically wouldn't it be worse for the Republicans if they had impeachment proceedings and then he wasn't impeached? It would be like an acquittal.

Responses:

The problem is you think the nut jobs are thinking strategically outside of their own districts. -- nm - spamlet Sep 12, 10:44
He doesn’t even have the votes to launch an inquiry at this stage, let alone pass articles of impeachment, so he’s decided that vote for the former isn’t actually needed after all. -- (edited) - znufrii, vice president Sep 12, 10:25
make no mistake. they will find the votes in the House to make it happen. its the whole point of the entire exercise. ie To dumb down Impeachment -- nm - Jovian Sep 12, 10:22 2
- hmm .. don't think so. -- nm - mud Sep 12, 10:28 1
  - wait for it. -- nm - Jovian Sep 12, 10:29
"But her emails" => "But he's being impeached." -- nm - JaxSean Sep 12, 10:20

Post a message top

We know that conviction in the Senate ain't happening, but there might not even be the votes in the House to impeach.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.