Backboards: 
Posts: 153
In response to "Oh boy, 768 has posted his recruit rankings for this season. Let's see what he thinks of mine." by Baron Hardcoden

My talent evaluation this cycle was great as I am on the #9, 11, and 15 players, all ties. Would love to land 1 of them. My backup plan fyc

I've got 3 net guys, all clear.

#70 Mark Rucker 6'6 E-scouted at +6, could play 3 positions.

#169 Logan Wetherington 6'5 shoot-second PG prospect, looks to be a +6 with upside.

#320 Ivan Davis 6'11 double-double guy with poor attributes (he's good-scouted to be +3/-1 at best) but a very decent line score of 10 pts, 9 reb, 3 ast, 1.3 stl, 2.5 bk, 1.4 to He'd likely be a bench big for 2 years with the hope he develops into a starting C or PF.

I'm curious if any of you would buy my argument to prioritize Davis ahead of Rucker (Wetherington is an inferior Rucker-type so I think an obvious 3rd priority).

The guards I'm in ties on are both 2/2s, and my other tie is a 6/6 on 6'11 Chris Moore. I can't really count on winning such a large tie, and serviceable 6'11 guys don't often fall into your lap like Davis did.

So If I win 1 of my 2/2s I would sign an elite guard, Ivan Davis, and Rucker. But I miss Rucker if I win 2 ties, in favor of the less-talented but taller Davis. And if I win 2 ties, it's either going to be another guard who's better than Rucker or I've got 2 6'11 guys and a guard who's better than Rucker.


Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.