Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 159
apparently one main AI sticking point is whether studios should get to reanimate dead actors for free at will -- (link)
Posted by
hollywood big shot (aka pickmix)
Nov 6 '23, 19:33
(No message)
they’re lighting what’s left of their business on fire over this
(twitter.com)
Responses:
maybe if moviegoers would stop clapping like trained seals every time they see a dead actor on screen, this wouldn't be an issue. -- nm
-
colin
Nov 7, 07:26
Yeah, no. The estate of a dead celeb controls the likeness of that dead celeb.
-
Mop🧹
Nov 6, 19:37
2
whatever contracts they may have had with the studios when they were alive likely didn't contemplate this type of re-use of their footage
-
hollywood big shot
Nov 6, 19:42
1
(it's hard to understate how pissed the actors are by this clause, especially coming at the 11th hour when they were expecting a done deal) -- (link)
-
hollywood big shot
Nov 7, 01:52
I'm not clicking through to read the post, but based on your subject line ... I've got an unfinished blog post about how that's immoral/unethical
-
Beryllium
Nov 6, 19:36
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.