ST Alpha - "I guess I just dispute that that is Rule #1." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "Baseball has decades of guys looking for edges. HGH now, greenies in the 60's/70's...etc etc." by Will Hunting

I guess I just dispute that that is Rule #1.

Posted by TFox Jul 27 '09, 05:58

Throwing a game for gambling, yes. Just gambling, with no real evidence that doing so ever impacted the outcome of a game ever? Meh.

Responses:

Word. I would think cheating would be the first rule of the game. And tanking a game because you gambled on it would fit that bill. - Jim Jul 27, 06:13 2
- Especially when you consider that the HOF didn't even make the rule until the year before he'd have been eligible. -- nm - Ender Jul 27, 06:15 1
  - (Which kind of makes me wonder what all the guff about Shoeless Joe was about, if he wasn't ineligible for the Hall until 1991.) -- nm - Ender Jul 27, 06:16

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.