Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 155
In response to
"
*shrug* Personally, I put more emphasis on rule-breaking that actually impacts the outcome of a game. -- nm
"
by
znufrii
Right, ultimately what he did didn't affect the game itself. -- nm
Posted by
Ender (aka Ender)
Jul 27 '09, 06:04
(No message)
Responses:
At least, there's no evidence that it did. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 27, 06:07
2
And no suggestion that it did either. The bookie wasn't exactly Rose's friend when he ratted on him yet there was no suggestion he bet against the team. -- nm
-
Ender
Jul 27, 06:13
1
And I can't imagine that if he had colluded with other teams it wouldn't have come out by now. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 27, 06:14
Really? That's a rather bold statement. -- nm
-
Don Homer
Jul 27, 06:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.