In response to
"about one of the most consequential scientists of the 20th century, because of the very consequential science he did over four years in WWII -- nm"
by
hollywood big shot
|
I haven’t yet seen it, but I wouldn’t expect a whole lot to be spelled out because most research is boring. did they not cover the big stuff/impact? -- nm
Posted by
i.b! (aka starrynut)
Jan 23 '24, 11:23
|
(No message)
|
Responses:
|