Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 08:21
2: Dec 1, 17:33
3: Dec 1, 11:23
4: Nov 30, 15:54
5: Nov 30, 09:41
6: Nov 29, 16:44
7: Nov 29, 08:01
8: Nov 28, 16:19
9: Nov 28, 09:42
10: Nov 27, 18:07
11: Nov 27, 12:04
12: Nov 27, 08:26
13: Nov 26, 18:06
14: Nov 26, 12:05
15: Nov 26, 08:29
16: Nov 25, 18:33
17: Nov 25, 11:12
18: Nov 25, 07:08
19: Nov 24, 13:17
20: Nov 23, 18:13
Posts: 156
In response to
"
I disagree with this - STFUing is not an option, he has to actively support the people who led the project. -- nm
"
by
Roger More
There is a very subtle difference between being disappointed and saying they should have been nominated. (NM)
Posted by
Marlowe
Jan 24 '24, 09:05
s
Responses:
If it was a critic or a commentator saying it, I'd agree with you. But this is someone who collaborated on a project with Gerwig and Robbie for a year
-
Roger More
Jan 24, 09:16
he did use the "disappointed" language, though, didn't he? I think it's a fair statement -- nm
-
Andie
Jan 24, 09:08
3
And the he said "Their work should be recognized along with the other very deserving nominees.” (NM)
-
Marlowe
Jan 24, 09:09
2
that's a very clever wording though. "recognition" could be taken as him recognizing it through that statement, I don't believe he ever said "they
-
Andie
Jan 24, 09:11
1
The best he could have done would be stop short of the one sentence that is interpreted as calling it a snub. (NM)
-
Marlowe
Jan 24, 09:19
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.