Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 157
$83.3 million might be a more significant chunk of change than he'll ever admit. -- nm
Posted by
TWuG
Jan 26 '24, 13:56
(No message)
Responses:
It's kind of a savvy judgement, big enough to hurt, not so big that it triggers appeals. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 26, 14:23
3
Why would anyone expect he’s not going to appeal anyway? -- nm*
-
Znufrii, promoted
Jan 26, 14:53
1
I mean it in the "that's a ludicrous amount that will be overturned" way. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 26, 14:55
has to appeal
-
Lafarrow
Jan 26, 14:31
the most expensive tweets ever posted -- nm
-
hollywood big shot
Jan 26, 13:58
3
... i dunno, the $44b tweets might fit that bill -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 26, 14:20
Maybe they can just give Carroll Trump Tower -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jan 26, 13:59
1
He doesn't own it. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jan 26, 16:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
