ST Alpha - "I’m confused. How did we already know that SCOTUS would be hearing arguments Thursday if this decision is just now being made? -- nm*" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 162

In response to "Presidents are not immune to prosecution -- (link)" by Reagen

I’m confused. How did we already know that SCOTUS would be hearing arguments Thursday if this decision is just now being made? -- nm*

Posted by mara (aka mara) Feb 6 '24, 07:40

(No message)

Responses:

And a bit more detail (if it helps) - ReluctantCynic Feb 6, 08:02 5
- Thanks! Will SCOTUS take up the immunity question soon? -- nm - mara Feb 6, 08:13 1
  - More than likely? Now that the appellate court has rule, Trump's team can request that SCOTUS fast-track their consideration. -- nm - ReluctantCynic Feb 6, 08:18
- Do they get to go back for another appeal based on due process questions (i.e. who gets to say whether or not 1/6 was actually an insurrection) -- (edited) - Znufrii, promoted Feb 6, 08:07 2
  - Those are fantastic questions. - ReluctantCynic Feb 6, 08:16 1
    - Appreciate the insight, thx! -- nm - Znufrii, promoted Feb 6, 08:19
I think the SCOTUS thing on Thursday regards being denied a place on several state primary ballots. -- nm - TWuG Feb 6, 07:43
Tomorrow's SCOTUS arguments are over the Colorado case and the 14th Amendment. -- nm - decline Feb 6, 07:43 1
- and this ruling was for the DC Federal case brought by Jack Smith for the insurrection. -- nm - decline Feb 6, 07:45
different case. The one they're hearing Thurs is the CO State Supreme Court ruling. -- nm* - Jovian Feb 6, 07:42

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.