ST Alpha - "This is true. however, overall I am not getting their theory. THey're saying that women are getting more beautiful but men aren't." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 172

In response to "Just because lesbians wouldn't procreate (willingly) in nature, doesn't mean the trait isn't useful in an" by TWuG

This is true. however, overall I am not getting their theory. THey're saying that women are getting more beautiful but men aren't.

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Jul 27 '09, 12:10

boys still have mothers, as far as I know.

Responses:

for a long time in human evolution we have lived in a male dominated world - Danedukenuuk Jul 27, 12:16
If the offspring of attractive people is 26% more likely to be female, then that means the attractiveness would be increasing disproportionately to - Beryllium Jul 27, 12:11 1
- that first thing would be a landmark scientific discovery in itself. -- nm - Reagen Jul 27, 12:12
I think there's an unstated assumption that boys look like their fathers and not their mothers. -- nm - Reagen Jul 27, 12:11

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.