Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 09:42
2: Nov 27, 18:07
3: Nov 27, 12:04
4: Nov 27, 08:26
5: Nov 26, 18:06
6: Nov 26, 12:05
7: Nov 26, 08:29
8: Nov 25, 18:33
9: Nov 25, 11:12
10: Nov 25, 07:08
11: Nov 24, 13:17
12: Nov 23, 18:13
13: Nov 23, 06:17
14: Nov 22, 13:24
15: Nov 22, 09:09
16: Nov 21, 22:36
17: Nov 21, 14:03
18: Nov 21, 10:18
19: Nov 21, 07:35
20: Nov 20, 15:19
Posts: 155
We just noticed this in real time while watching Milwaukee's game. -- (link)
Posted by
David (aka David)
Feb 8 '24, 19:14
(No message)
https://twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/1755770958562935190
(twitter.com)
Responses:
My instant thought when seeing that: Brad from Bachelor Party -- (link)
-
Max
Feb 8, 22:39
[youtube]
that trade is baffling. -- nm
-
mafic
Feb 8, 19:37
5
like I get why the Bucks traded a guy for cash, but why trade for a guy just to waive him? goodwill? some weird salary cap stuff? -- nm
-
mafic
Feb 8, 19:52
4
Yup. Milwaukee gets his cap hit off their ledger sheet. Sacramento picks up cash in exchange for taking and waiving him.
-
David
Feb 8, 20:07
3
wait, the Kings got the cash as well? I thought they paid for him. I suppose 'cash considerations' is ambiguous. -- nm
-
mafic
Feb 8, 20:09
2
Right. It saves Milwaukee $8.6 million in cap space, and they had a cash transaction trade exception they were gonna lose soon anyway. -- nm
-
David
Feb 8, 20:15
1
Here. -- (link)
-
David
Feb 8, 20:16
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
