Backboards: 
Posts: 155
In response to "those 3 are stupid morons from hell. -- nm" by mud

Reading the THR review, I'd describe it as neutral more than negative

"Dune: Part Two maintains the grandiose visual style introduced in Dune while also paying more attention to story and character development."

"Running close to three hours, Dune: Part Two moves with a similar nimbleness to Paul and Chani’s sandwalk through the open desert. The narrative is propulsive and relatively easy to follow, Hans Zimmer’s score is enveloping, and Greig Fraser’s cinematography offers breathtaking perspectives that deepen our understanding of the fervently sought-after planet. All these elements make the sequel as much of a cinematic event as the first movie."

The criticism is

"Still, Part Two is plagued by a nagging shallowness when it comes to portraying the Fremen, an indigenous people fighting for self-determination within the empire; the film has difficulty fully embracing the nuance of Herbert’s anti-imperial and ecologically dystopian text. "


Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.