Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Based on what Fontenot has said and done, I think we're gonna trade up for a QB.
"
by
David
There is talk here that if Daniels goes 2,
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Feb 27 '24, 14:11
New England would shop #3 and take the highest offer.
8 and Pitts for 3?
Responses:
SF gave up 3 firsts for Trey lance; so your return is insanely low... -- nm
-
Beaker 🍻
Feb 27, 14:19
3
I agree that the price will likely be higher than that. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Feb 27, 14:24
1
FWIW, I don't think Pitts has much value now that everybody knows his knee was wrecked worse than the Falcons let on. -- nm
-
David
Feb 27, 14:27
Given what happened, I don't see anybody ever doing that again for QB3. -- nm
-
David
Feb 27, 14:20
Right now, I think the goal is to get to #2 and take Maye. Daniels wouldn't fit as well with McVay's scheme as he did with Smith's.
-
David
Feb 27, 14:17
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.