Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 152
In response to
"
MSNBC: the way SCOTUS is framing the question of immunity is opening the door, not a narrow focus of actions to hang onto office but any immunity @all -- nm
"
by
zeitgeist
The who in the what now? -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Feb 28 '24, 19:44
(No message)
Responses:
the grant of cert frames the question presented to SCOTUS however SCOTUS thinks the question should be framed. in this case
-
hollywood big shot
Feb 28, 19:54
3
this tweet gets it -- (link)
-
hollywood big shot
Feb 28, 20:11
Are you saying you think they definitely will or will not rule in 45's favor? -- nm
-
David
Feb 28, 20:01
1
legally, no other sup ct would have even granted cert. when he got kicked off the ballot in Col they moved real fast to quash that shit
-
hollywood big shot
Feb 28, 20:08
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.