Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 152
In response to
"
The who in the what now? -- nm
"
by
David
the grant of cert frames the question presented to SCOTUS however SCOTUS thinks the question should be framed. in this case
Posted by
hollywood big shot (aka pickmix)
Feb 28 '24, 19:54
they framed it whether any president should have immunity for alleged official acts when charged criminally for those acts out of office. the framing already gives away the game
Responses:
this tweet gets it -- (link)
-
hollywood big shot
Feb 28, 20:11
Are you saying you think they definitely will or will not rule in 45's favor? -- nm
-
David
Feb 28, 20:01
1
legally, no other sup ct would have even granted cert. when he got kicked off the ballot in Col they moved real fast to quash that shit
-
hollywood big shot
Feb 28, 20:08
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.