Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 156
In response to
"
Lawyers in Elon Musk compensation lawsuit seeking $6 billion dollar fee -- (link)
"
by
znufrii
(in securing $55b worth of value to Tesla shareholders by getting dipshit's comp package tossed out of court) -- nm
Posted by
hollywood big shot (aka pickmix)
Mar 2 '24, 18:25
(No message)
Responses:
Right. They clawed back Musk's salary, and they want a percentage of the money saved. I'd argue this is equally unreasonable. -- nm
-
Mop🧹
Mar 2, 18:37
5
If the original ask wasn't so large, the penalty wouldn't be either. -- nm
-
Reagen
Mar 3, 02:36
11% is a 15-20% discount the usual contingency fee -- nm
-
hollywood big shot
Mar 2, 19:41
2
Sure, but at some point you gotta say enough is enough, no? -- nm
-
Mop🧹
Mar 2, 19:43
1
not when $55b is on the line -- nm
-
hollywood big shot
Mar 2, 19:45
what percentage does a lawyer get in deals like this, that's much less than the 40% contingency fee ambulance chasers get. -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Mar 2, 19:02
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
