Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 157
In response to
"
uh did the $175m check bounce? -- (link)
"
by
hollywood big shot
And WSJ wants me to believe this pinhead is leading in 6 out of 7 battleground states. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Apr 3 '24, 13:49
(No message)
Responses:
He is, scarily. Has been for a long time.
-
Inigo
Apr 3, 13:56
8
Mmmhmm. -- nm
-
David
Apr 3, 14:19
7
Not sure what your deal is with this is.
-
Inigo
Apr 3, 14:23
6
My "deal" is my total disregard for the accuracy of polling.
-
David
Apr 3, 14:29
5
Then it seems a bit odd to point out just WSJ if all polling is terrible.
-
Inigo
Apr 3, 14:41
1
*shrugs* I'm odd. -- nm
-
David
Apr 3, 14:49
Thank you for joining my side.
-
Strongbad
Apr 3, 14:34
2
It has gotten specifically worse in recent years as sampling has become more difficult. -- nm
-
Reagen
Apr 3, 14:45
1
Yup, and this year's primaries are so bad they have a wow factor. -- nm
-
David
Apr 3, 14:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
