ST Alpha - "who the fuck would pay for just the streamer without rights to the shows? gong show. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "if they buy Paramount in it's entirety yeah. but if they just want Paramount + I don't think so. David should know more on this -- nm" by Remlik

who the fuck would pay for just the streamer without rights to the shows? gong show. -- nm

Posted by Beaker 🍺 (aka Anniebecca) Apr 9 '24, 08:38

(No message)

Responses:

right? But most of the deals I've read and hear Kim & co. talk about is that companies that want to buy out want the streamer & not Paramount -- nm - Remlik Apr 9, 08:42 6
- Nobody wants linear, but corporations won’t sell piecemeal. Otherwise, they’d get stuck with the rotting corpse. -- nm - David Apr 9, 08:44 5
  - I get what you're saying (and I basically agree), but there is still big money in linear for at least two more decades -- nm - Remlik Apr 9, 08:58
  - lol unlike the non-rotting corpse of the streamers that continue to bleed money from their collective aortas - hollywood big shot Apr 9, 08:48 3
    - Sure, and I've got a good feeling about the return of pagers! -- nm - David Apr 9, 09:55
    - I dunno. Pluto seems to be viable and they're just a service without owning or producing any content. That's even with Viacom buying them -- nm - JD Apr 9, 08:57 1
      - Plus, Netflix is wildly profitable. Hulu has had steady profit for a while now. Max just got a year of profitability. -- (edited) - Inigo Apr 9, 09:07

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.