Backboards: 
Posts: 154
In response to "But, Trump paid Daniels, not the Enquirer. -- nm" by pmb

BTW, I assume the court has already ruled that the alleged actions are sufficient to constitute election interference to serve as a predicate to the

crime, right? His lawyers would have had to argue that already I assume.

Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.