ST Alpha - "Israel had previously accepted the terms (though I'm not sure if they've changed at all). For some time now it's been Hamas rejecting the terms. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "Hamas accepting a ceasefire doesn't mean Israel accepts a ceasefire. -- nm" by Mop🧹

Israel had previously accepted the terms (though I'm not sure if they've changed at all). For some time now it's been Hamas rejecting the terms. -- nm

Posted by pmb (aka pmb) May 6 '24, 10:39

(No message)

Responses:

Per follow-up reports I’m seeing, the ceasefire proposal Hamas has accepted is a “softened” version proposed by Egypt that Israel will not agree to. -- nm* - znufrii May 6, 10:40 4
- maybe? but also Bibi has every incentive to move the goalposts himself if an otherwise acceptable deal gets both sides to "yes" -- nm - hollywood big shot May 6, 10:45
- What are the new terms? Can you link? -- nm - pmb May 6, 10:42 2
  - I haven’t read any of the details, just catching updates from the Guardian live blog so far. -- (edited) - znufrii May 6, 10:45 1
    - There appears to be no details. -- nm - pmb May 6, 11:17

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.