Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 153
In response to
"
i guess the note behind the note is EDD (the unemployment office) really didn't like the way some entertainment folks were using their loan-outs -- (link)
"
by
hollywood big shot
Treat me like I'm dumb and explain to me why this is bad. -- nm
Posted by
Mop🧹 (aka rburriel)
May 24 '24, 22:42
(No message)
Responses:
i believe most distributions to the principal previously were treated essentially as capital gains and taxed but not generally subject to withholdings -- (link)
-
hollywood big shot
May 24, 22:50
4
like for example, Keanu's next $20m John Wick deal would now, in theory, be treated like any schmuck's bi-weekly paycheck at work -- nm
-
hollywood big shot
May 24, 22:53
3
That seems like a gross misinterpretation of the ruling.
-
Mop🧹
May 24, 23:22
2
there was concern at the time the gig worker law was passed that it could be applied to loan outs, which the guilds assured membership it wouldn't -- (link)
-
hollywood big shot
May 24, 23:31
1
and that may still yet end up being the case but . . . screenwriter twitter isn't sleeping easy tonight based on their collective "uh EDD said wut now?" -- nm*
-
hollywood big shot
May 24, 23:33
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.