ST Alpha - "You're talking about a politician, which I specifically am not doing. I'm discussing methodology. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

In response to "I think a bit of scepticism of polling is fine and warranted. " by Inigo

You're talking about a politician, which I specifically am not doing. I'm discussing methodology.

Posted by David (aka David) Jun 1 '24, 08:04

I missed the 2016 Presidential election, and I cannot stand when I make mistakes. I haven't once dismissed a candidate as viable. Instead, I raise the same questions about polling that I do the inaccuracy of Nielsen ratings. When a system is broken, that's something I notice. You keep injecting your opinions of what you think I'm saying into what I'm actually saying. There's a system in place that no longer works, but the people running said system don't know what else to do. So, they keep using it despite its ineffectiveness. That's the problem I have.

Responses:

"A lot of people are onto the con now" sounds like a comment on people's "true" opinions of Trump that doesn't show up in the polls. - Inigo Jun 1, 08:38 1
- (Discussed offline.) -- nm* - David Jun 1, 09:00

Post a message top

You're talking about a politician, which I specifically am not doing. I'm discussing methodology.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.