ST Alpha - "Rolling Stone doesn’t have the best track record on lists, but their “50 most disappointing sequels” provides common ground in these divided times -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 150

Rolling Stone doesn’t have the best track record on lists, but their “50 most disappointing sequels” provides common ground in these divided times -- (link)

Posted by Roger More (aka RogerMore) Jul 2 '24, 17:51

(No message)

https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-lists/worst-movie-sequels-1235041301/ (www.rollingstone.com)

Responses:

agree on TROS tho -- nm - mafic Jul 2, 19:25
T3 should be way higher on that list if the metric is drop-off from previous films. hot take: the Lost World - not bad. -- nm - mafic Jul 2, 19:19 2
- also not bad: Terminator Dark Fate. best post-Cameron Terminator, which is a very low bar, but still. -- nm - mafic Jul 2, 19:22 1
  - Dark Fate is great. -- nm - mud Jul 2, 19:28
True or false? Theres a Zoolander 2. I would’ve been wrong. -- nm - Volnelk 🍊 Jul 2, 18:30
uh needs way more Matrix -- nm - hollywood big shot Jul 2, 17:55 5
- No Bond films…really? Also Indy 4> Indy 5 (abomination of a film) -- nm - Trending Jul 2, 18:18 1
  - I have low expectations for Bond movies. even the late Brosnan ones or like Moonraker or View to a Kill are still dumb fun. -- nm - mafic Jul 2, 19:31
- Nothing from the Alien franchise either -- nm - Roger More Jul 2, 18:13 2
  - Resurrection at 40 -- nm - mafic Jul 2, 19:25 1
    - Ooops -- nm - Roger More Jul 2, 19:29

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.