ST Alpha - "Because it is not conducive in helping to get him "re-elected". -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 150

In response to "Also, Trump related (sorry), how is that the media is really not covering at all the Epstein files release with pictures of him with 12 year old girls" by pmb

Because it is not conducive in helping to get him "re-elected". -- nm

Posted by Jovian (aka Jovian) Jul 5 '24, 10:45

(No message)

Responses:

From the media's standpoint, a second Trump term most likely means higher ratings. -- nm - Dano Jul 5, 10:46 6
- Of course. Thats why they're all (minus msnbc) fully behind him. -- nm - Jovian Jul 5, 10:47 5
  - [eyeroll] -- nm - mud Jul 5, 10:48 4
    - still talking about the debate this morning on CNN. Yep they're definitely not in the bag for DJT. -- nm - Jovian Jul 5, 10:49 3
      - Just this alone should be enough. That they're still talking about the debate, even after scotus' Yes DJT is a King ruling and these Epstein files - Jovian Jul 5, 10:53 2
        
        I'm done defending CNN, but you said "all (minus msnbc)" -- nm - mud Jul 5, 10:55 1
        
        NY Times is clearly in the bag, local news has its heads up its asses (unless their Sinclair owned, then theyre fully in the bag), and not really sure - Jovian Jul 5, 10:59

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.