Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 154
In response to
"
Related to below: watched “Beverly Hills 4.” Netflix spent $150M on this for no revenue when this would have been $200M domestic no question. -- nm
"
by
MDH
I doubt it would have made $200m given the reviews -- nm
Posted by
hollywood big shot (aka pickmix)
Jul 7 '24, 12:08
(No message)
Responses:
it is 66% a RT, what reviews are you talking about? -- nm
-
Beaker 🍻
Jul 7, 13:05
Yeah I turned it off after 5 mins. -- nm
-
Loyola
Jul 7, 12:18
It's weird -- most of the people I've seen online have really enjoyed it. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jul 7, 12:11
3
It's decent. It's better than 3. But it lacks the bite that 1 and 2 had. They really could have done something if Eddie had been up for it
-
Remlik
Jul 7, 12:47
1
Netflix stopped trying after CODA beat their ass at the Oscars. they know "shit plus one" won't cause anyone to cancel their subs so why try harder -- nm
-
hollywood big shot
Jul 7, 13:41
it’s good enough seemingly but making $200m in theaters currently is a huge lift -- nm
-
hollywood big shot
Jul 7, 12:13
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
