Backboards: 
Posts: 152
In response to "the problem with Brady material (usually) is it only encompasses evidence that is exculpatory to the defendant. so then prosecutors have to decide" by hollywood big shot

To reframe what I'm saying above, if it's not the judge's job, why is he suddenly responsible for determining that the bullets are exculpatory -- (edited)

if the prosecutor decides that they were not? Why is that suddenly the judge's job if getting involved is not his job?

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.