Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 157
In response to
"
U23s only.
"
by
Loyola
interesting that's it's different for the men and women -- nm
Posted by
prayformojo (aka mayhem)
Jul 24 '24, 13:47
(No message)
Responses:
I'm pretty sure that's a complete disregard for Women's sports and at best the Women's WC isn't worth protecting like the rules are designed to do for
-
JD
Jul 24, 13:52
2
I think it's more that FIFA sees the Olympics as helping women's football grow in popularity, while this is not needed for the men.
-
Roger More
Jul 24, 14:20
1
And definitely not because FIFA didn’t want it to compete with the Men’s World Cup in terms of prominence. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 24, 14:37
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.