Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 158
In response to
"
Perpetual mandatory arbitration clause attached to an online account instead of specific transactions seems pretty evil. -- (edited)
"
by
znufrii
word to your im Haven't there been cases where fine print has been thrown out due to it being too long and legalize for a normal person to understand? -- nm
Posted by
Beaker 🍺 (aka Anniebecca)
Aug 14 '24, 06:36
(No message)
Responses:
yes, or it is against " public policy"
-
Epiphany
Aug 14, 07:04
Isn’t that all fine print, though? :) -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 14, 06:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.