ST Alpha - "I still have no idea how I'm supposed to interpret "My God, it's full of stars." -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

I still have no idea how I'm supposed to interpret "My God, it's full of stars." -- nm

Posted by David (aka David) Sep 9 '24, 20:40

(No message)

Responses:

well there's always 2010 - mr mooch Sep 9, 20:41 10
- That's what I'm watching. They never actually say "My God, it's full of stars" in 2001. -- nm - David Sep 9, 20:50 9
  - An exceptionally underrated sci-fi flick -- nm - Jovian Sep 10, 06:50 4
    - It holds up. It's actually the film I.S.S. wants to be. -- nm - David Sep 10, 06:51 3
      - What an utter disappointment that flick was. I am so glad I didnt see that in theaters. (and I was very close to going) -- nm - Jovian Sep 10, 07:07 2
        
        saw it in theaters. it was aight for being 14 and not knowing any better -- nm - mr mooch Sep 10, 07:35 1
        
        he means ISS. 2010 was excellent. -- nm - mud Sep 10, 07:37
  - it's in the book for sure. I've read conflicting stories about why it's not in the movie. -- nm - mafic Sep 9, 20:58 3
    - Right, it's in the book Clarke hastily wrote while mad at Kubrick. And it's at the start of 2010. -- nm - David Sep 9, 21:07 2
      - I've heard both "it's in the script but was cut because it didn't jive with the effects," and "just something Clarke wrote on his own." -- nm - mafic Sep 9, 21:09 1
        
        Kubrick apparently removed a lot of Clarke's narration without telling the writer. Clarke loved the film until he saw the final cut. -- nm - David Sep 9, 21:17

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.