Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 151
In response to
"
apropos of nothing/everything: I still can't believe this election is so close. -- nm
"
by
ty97
I'm not convinced it is. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Sep 13 '24, 13:02
(No message)
Responses:
I'd sooner believe 53-46 than 50-48. -- nm
-
Reagen
Sep 13, 13:23
1
the national polls were pretty consistently in the 5% lead range this week (up a few points from the last round) -- nm
-
mr mooch
Sep 13, 13:47
In any case he's still likely to get ~>40% of the popular vote, which is insane. There are way too many deplorables. -- nm*
-
Max
Sep 13, 13:11
2
Agree with David and Max here. -- nm
-
JaxSean
Sep 13, 13:19
Agreed. -- nm
-
David
Sep 13, 13:13
Indicators are that it is. Obviously we don't get to see the reality until the election. -- nm
-
ty97
Sep 13, 13:04
9
The "indicators" are polls and the media. I've stopped believing in the former, and the latter has incentive to exaggerate the matter.
-
David
Sep 13, 13:06
8
Would be great if polls were wrongly biased against Dems this year, and it's a possibility (something we can only decide post-election alas) -- nm
-
ty97
Sep 13, 13:26
7
I do think MAGA folk are more likely to answer random calls and answer polls than others. But I admit I'm still blown away by the "undecided voters"
-
pmb
Sep 13, 13:31
5
If that's true, it would have been true in 2020 as well. Also, I think polls adjusted for historical/expected turnout.
-
ty97
Sep 13, 13:34
4
I think they were off in 2020. I don't think they predicted a PV spread that big. The EC makes everything more complicated (needlessly so). -- nm
-
pmb
Sep 13, 13:42
3
Polls were off in 2020, at least in the key swing states. They overstated Biden by a few points. -- (edited)
-
ty97
Sep 13, 13:50
2
But in the mid-terms it largely went the other way (remember the red wave?). -- nm
-
pmb
Sep 13, 14:07
1
Yes, but mid-terms have acted differently -- nm
-
ty97
Sep 13, 14:35
But it was the cycle in 2020 and especially 2022.
-
David
Sep 13, 13:29
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.