ST Alpha - "Indicators are that it is. Obviously we don't get to see the reality until the election. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "I'm not convinced it is. -- nm" by David

Indicators are that it is. Obviously we don't get to see the reality until the election. -- nm

Posted by ty97 Sep 13 '24, 13:04

(No message)

Responses:

The "indicators" are polls and the media. I've stopped believing in the former, and the latter has incentive to exaggerate the matter. - David Sep 13, 13:06 8
- Would be great if polls were wrongly biased against Dems this year, and it's a possibility (something we can only decide post-election alas) -- nm - ty97 Sep 13, 13:26 7
  - I do think MAGA folk are more likely to answer random calls and answer polls than others. But I admit I'm still blown away by the "undecided voters" - pmb Sep 13, 13:31 5
    - If that's true, it would have been true in 2020 as well. Also, I think polls adjusted for historical/expected turnout. - ty97 Sep 13, 13:34 4
      - I think they were off in 2020. I don't think they predicted a PV spread that big. The EC makes everything more complicated (needlessly so). -- nm - pmb Sep 13, 13:42 3
        
        Polls were off in 2020, at least in the key swing states. They overstated Biden by a few points. -- (edited) - ty97 Sep 13, 13:50 2
        
        But in the mid-terms it largely went the other way (remember the red wave?). -- nm - pmb Sep 13, 14:07 1
        
        Yes, but mid-terms have acted differently -- nm - ty97 Sep 13, 14:35
  - But it was the cycle in 2020 and especially 2022. - David Sep 13, 13:29

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.