ST Alpha - "I do think MAGA folk are more likely to answer random calls and answer polls than others. But I admit I'm still blown away by the "undecided voters" " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Would be great if polls were wrongly biased against Dems this year, and it's a possibility (something we can only decide post-election alas) -- nm" by ty97

I do think MAGA folk are more likely to answer random calls and answer polls than others. But I admit I'm still blown away by the "undecided voters"

Posted by pmb (aka pmb) Sep 13 '24, 13:31

on the news that are still undecided after the debate. Though I think many of them really can't imagine voting democrat but just are put off by Trump. They just don't buy the "danger" issues.

Responses:

If that's true, it would have been true in 2020 as well. Also, I think polls adjusted for historical/expected turnout. - ty97 Sep 13, 13:34 4
- I think they were off in 2020. I don't think they predicted a PV spread that big. The EC makes everything more complicated (needlessly so). -- nm - pmb Sep 13, 13:42 3
  - Polls were off in 2020, at least in the key swing states. They overstated Biden by a few points. -- (edited) - ty97 Sep 13, 13:50 2
    - But in the mid-terms it largely went the other way (remember the red wave?). -- nm - pmb Sep 13, 14:07 1
      - Yes, but mid-terms have acted differently -- nm - ty97 Sep 13, 14:35

Post a message top

I do think MAGA folk are more likely to answer random calls and answer polls than others. But I admit I'm still blown away by the "undecided voters"

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.