Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 30, 15:54
2: Nov 30, 09:41
3: Nov 29, 16:44
4: Nov 29, 08:01
5: Nov 28, 16:19
6: Nov 28, 09:42
7: Nov 27, 18:07
8: Nov 27, 12:04
9: Nov 27, 08:26
10: Nov 26, 18:06
11: Nov 26, 12:05
12: Nov 26, 08:29
13: Nov 25, 18:33
14: Nov 25, 11:12
15: Nov 25, 07:08
16: Nov 24, 13:17
17: Nov 23, 18:13
18: Nov 23, 06:17
19: Nov 22, 13:24
20: Nov 22, 09:09
Posts: 153
In response to
"
opinions vary. To me it's more likely they legit thought they had or would procure evidence and could use it at face value, and they pulled the trigge
"
by
rollo
Not sure I follow you. Both things can be true. -- nm
Posted by
con_carne
Sep 29 '24, 12:23
(No message)
Responses:
"I made it up to get you talking about the real story" was ex post facto justification. They actually believed it was true and were shocked that they
-
Reagen
Sep 29, 12:27
5
They didn't do some basic research, which would have told them Haitians have never been know for eating cats and dogs.
-
.
Sep 29, 12:31
4
to be clear, they do not care about the second part. -- nm
-
Reagen
Sep 29, 12:44
it started as ducks and geese (horrible but plausible) and they didn't blink when it shifted and amplified to household pets(horrible and implausible) -- nm
-
rollo
Sep 29, 12:37
2
Yeah, I guess I'm having trouble squaring the "they were waiting for evidence" with this shift that is surely a fabrication. -- nm
-
con_carne
Sep 29, 12:44
1
The failure to ever find Miss Sassy again would have sufficed as "evidence" -- nm
-
rollo
Sep 29, 12:56
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.