|
In response to
"$60b in new "IP driven attractions" is exactly what your average family looking to take a theme park trip is salivating for -- (link)"
by
mr mooch
|
If it is a Disney trip, well, yeah. I mean the parks themselves are IP. IMO, tis the difference between theme park and thrill/amusement park
Posted by
JD (aka Jason Dean)
Oct 1 '24, 10:02
|
Like, Magic Mountain has it's appeal but it's not the theme. I mean it makes sense that the place looks a desert with rocks and cactus but not really a theme. Even the DC tie in for ride naming, not really the point. It's about the tallest, fastest, most inversions, most Gs, and whatever the heck one calls X2.
But Universal and Disney....Harry Potter, Mario, Jurassic Park and then there's Disney classic so Dumbo and Fantasy Land and then there's your infamous IP: Star Wars and Marvel
I still want to see a WALL-E roaming around like there was in the Disney/Pixar short. I'm more Coco than Encanto but the same IP principle still applies.
|