ST Alpha - "Interesting...I didn't realize LCD TV's (and Plamsas - wow) use 43% more energy than old cathode-ray TVs. -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

Interesting...I didn't realize LCD TV's (and Plamsas - wow) use 43% more energy than old cathode-ray TVs. -- (link)

Posted by JaxSean (aka JaxSean) Aug 2 '09, 00:01

(No message)

LCD's consume 43% more energ y on average than the older CRTs, while plasma TVs suck three times as much. (www.timescolonist.com)

Responses:

not per square inch of viewing area they don't -- nm - Danedukenuuk Aug 2, 03:28
I find this to be completely counter-intuitive. Why, then, do computer LCDs consume far less power than computer CRTs? -- nm - Beryllium Aug 2, 00:30 2
- computer lcd's are only a little larger than the CRT they replaced, but wall mounted LCDs are much larger than the tube they replace -- nm - zeitgeist Aug 2, 00:33 1
  - geez, you say that as though I should have read the link. ;-) -- nm - Beryllium Aug 2, 00:36

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.