ST Alpha - "Past 1964…so out of their self-imposed boundary of “Noir’s best films”…but you’re 100% correct -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "LIR Noir film list, I get they are all classic films, but feel like Brick should have still been included. -- nm" by sycor

Past 1964…so out of their self-imposed boundary of “Noir’s best films”…but you’re 100% correct -- nm

Posted by Trending (aka Flavorize) Oct 7 '24, 12:51

(No message)

Responses:

I didn't see the 1964 bit. I just the "of all time" part. Poor writing IMO. -- nm - sycor Oct 7, 13:09 7
- 100% agreement—I called it snobby and unnecessary to limit it—but Marlowe called me out for it 🤷‍♂️ -- nm - Trending Oct 7, 13:36 6
  - I agree that they should have said it on top that 1964 was a conceptual cutoff. - Marlowe Oct 7, 13:43 3
    - Im probably being overly critical…it is nice to see some rarely mentioned stuff make the list but “best ever” sticks in my craw— - Trending Oct 7, 14:05 2
      - I will agree with that. (NM) - Marlowe Oct 7, 14:09 1
        
        🤝🤜🤛 -- nm - Trending Oct 7, 14:18
  - I'm with Marlowe - mistaken title aside, it was nice to have a list that didn't suffer from the recency effect and I look fwd to the neo-noir list -- nm - Roger More Oct 7, 13:42 1
    - Same. Great list, and I'd love to watch some of the ones I've never seen. - Dark Callisto 🦊 Oct 7, 13:45

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.