ST Alpha - "FINALLY: LAT and WaPo owners/managers not allowing the editor to endorse two weeks before the election is *in itself* an endorsement...of Trump -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Add on to that: If these owners have a philosophical problem with endorsements (similar to you) then why wasn't this change made previously. -- (edited)" by ty97

FINALLY: LAT and WaPo owners/managers not allowing the editor to endorse two weeks before the election is in itself an endorsement...of Trump -- nm

Posted by ty97 Oct 25 '24, 11:49

(No message)

Responses:

Yes. If they made that decision after the last election and explained their reasoning, ok (though I would still disagree in something as - pmb Oct 25, 12:08
Yes, it clearly is. It's in proactive service of what Trump would want (without nakedly committing to it) -- nm - Beryllium Oct 25, 11:51 1
- And thus why the papers are in hot water. How can you trust either LAT or WaPo now? -- nm - ty97 Oct 25, 11:52

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.