Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 151
In response to
"
FINALLY: LAT and WaPo owners/managers not allowing the editor to endorse two weeks before the election is *in itself* an endorsement...of Trump -- nm
"
by
ty97
Yes, it clearly is. It's in proactive service of what Trump would want (without nakedly committing to it) -- nm
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Oct 25 '24, 11:51
(No message)
Responses:
And thus why the papers are in hot water. How can you trust either LAT or WaPo now? -- nm
-
ty97
Oct 25, 11:52
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.